Author Topic: Cothing Optional is Good Enough?  (Read 2886 times)

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5351
    • View Profile
Re: Cothing Optional is Good Enough?
« Reply #30 on: November 21, 2024, 11:31:48 PM »
Yea, I like that comment, very appt, "Stupid." I let the group leader know how stupid it was.

He went on about varying reactions that people have to nudity, like there are intensities and these are legit perspectives to be respected and quite natural. You and I know that any symptom where a person is uncomfortable with the uncovered form of a member of its own species is displaying some degree of what I'd call gymnophobia spectrum disorder. Nude bodies are the default as you say. ;)

Jbee
Barefoot all over, all over.

Greenbare Woods

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1948
  • Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
    • View Profile
    • Greenbare Photos
Re: Cothing Optional is Good Enough?
« Reply #31 on: November 22, 2024, 05:30:46 PM »
Yea, I like that comment, very appt, "Stupid." I let the group leader know how stupid it was.

What hot spring was that?   


Quote
He went on about varying reactions that people have to nudity, like there are intensities and these[] are legit perspectives to be respected and quite natural. You and I know that any symptom where a person is uncomfortable with the uncovered form of a member of its own species is displaying some degree of what I'd call gymnophobia spectrum disorder. Nude bodies are the default as you say. ;)  Jbee

Not surprised by his body phobia perspective.  Most "nudists" and nudist organizations talk a lot about "body acceptance" but then their practices push the opposite message.  Human body parts are okay to be seen, but only in "appropriate places."   Kitchens and dining areas are not "appropriate places" for many so-called nudists.

They also are horrified if any of those body parts are seen doing any normal biological functions.  You have to be segregated to poo or pee, and even then hide your body function in a cubicle.  Normal pleasurable functions are shamed and ostracized.  Look, but don't ever touch your own or your partner's.   And men better go hide if we start feeling erotic.   Don't dare sit on their chair, your body parts are "unclean."   There is no acceptance of human bodies, nor common body functions and emotions in any of that "nudist" policy. 

I can't say I'm surprised about requiring clothing in kitchen areas.  I sometimes visit events in Kansas, USA, at the Gaia Retreat Center where clothing is optional in most areas except their kitchen and dining rooms.   They have a really nasty "cover your junk"  sign as you approach their dining hall area. 

Body shame is so strongly taught as such a young age that even most nudists can only take one small step away from their body phobic training. 
Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
To see more of Bob you can view his personal photo page
http://www.photos.bradkemp.com/greenbare.html

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5351
    • View Profile
Re: Cothing Optional is Good Enough?
« Reply #32 on: Today at 08:35:37 AM »
"Cover your Junk"!!

What ever became of "family jewels,""Special parts."

Calling it "junk" says an awful lot about one's relationship to their own body, as well as others...I say it is sick to find such disgust in something so good. There is also an idea that genitals are dirty and diseased, even dangerous. Dangerous? Being sure to wash your hands after touching something that is put in, or on someone's one's mouth as an act of love? It just doesn't make sense. This stuff has to be taught at a young age.
Jbee
Barefoot all over, all over.