She has a background in law enforcement, and law. Regulation and fear of "bad guys" and "crazy" people,and degenerates, outside of BYU construct maybe suit her. She could be insulated from the outside world, and surrounded by peers also in that mindset. This could lead her to believe her projection out of that cage, thinking that she is a norm. This is not unusual in itself, but coupled with the hints from her background, she may have been very surprised by her hiking peers reaction and what I wrote. She could be a very disciplined young lady, who spends her time on the trail accomplishing and mastering it. She may have grown up in girlscouts, or family camping and thru hiking is a breakaway to independence, or pride and coming of age and her own, but still in context of what she grew up with and knows.
If she took it down because it was offensive as we suspect. She is rethinking the whole issue. Maybe she got a boyfriend or girlfriend and nature is taking this silliness out of her.
You are correct Eyesup, we can't know. It seems that most likely an intelligent post in rebuttal has had the effect of taking down negative anti- body freedom hogwash. Her points were good after all of that. If we hear them again in the future without the hogwash, we will know.
It is important to rebuttal, politely, all anti-body postings on the internet and in mass and scientifically. It is important, like doing events and being seen and letting opinions be put out in all media. The culture of backpacking and hiking is being changed. Nude hiking is commonly acceptable in the hardcore community and they are the respected leaders.
Jbee