After further consideration, the bells would disturb wildlife. Because we are a minority, someone might think that we should wear bells.
This puts two fringe minority elements at each other, nudes and prudes. Both wish that they had free reign and others conform. One of those minority groups actually does have free reign, approval and but not particularly, has a wish that others join them. The other group sees that they have a right to impose their value system upon others and force others to join them. This says to me something about prudish personalities.
Both assume that the majority is concerned about nudity. It seems that both assumptions are incorrect. 97% are accepting of nude people.
When we talked with the Forest Service official, he was surprised when we popped up with stats. He assumed. So, it may be that significant numbers of the majority that accepts nude bodies assume that there are many who do object. Assuming that people object to nude bodies may be the greater obstacle to nude liberation, from authorities and law.
It follows that the better way to get over this obstacle is for people to see and read about nude bodies roaming around. Still, it is one reaction to think it out in one's livingroom and often another reaction to actually experience seeing a nude and realizing from the experience that it is no big deal and non-sexual.
Jbee