Author Topic: Couple from New England  (Read 281 times)

QuaternFluvial

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Couple from New England
« on: November 28, 2024, 07:34:45 PM »
Hey folks...we are a couple from the Northeast US and are avid naturist and naturalists. We love the outdoors including freehiking, running, camping. We have been nudists for a long time and are active through out substack and our twitter profile. https://substack.com/@fritxhaus and https://x.com/quatern_fluvial if you want to connect or see out adventures and reports.

Safebare

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2024, 10:27:42 PM »
Welcome Fritz! I am the one that suggested you to check out this forum. I hope you have had the opportunity to poke around. We look forward to you perspective and insight in the world of freehiking or as we like to call it, Free Range Naturism. We are a global community always in search of like minded individuals to share experiences and ideas. Be sure to check out the Trip Reports, I think you will find synergy within.

Stay Safe, Stay Bare!

Greenbare Woods

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
  • Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
    • View Profile
    • Greenbare Photos
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2024, 06:01:31 PM »
Greetings.   We free range folks on here are geographically separated.    I'm from Washington state.  Your linked site shows some nice free range hikes and such.  You can actually post a direct link here that would open the image in this site post.  But you can't post a picture on here without posting it somewhere else first.  Welcome. 
Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
To see more of Bob you can view his personal photo page
http://www.photos.bradkemp.com/greenbare.html

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5424
    • View Profile
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2024, 08:23:10 PM »
Yes, share your adventures with us.
Jbee

WARNING!!!! the next post contains a video of simple male masturbation. This flimflam member needs to be banned.
« Last Edit: January 23, 2025, 07:31:39 PM by jbeegoode »
Barefoot all over, all over.

Hydrocbnu69

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2025, 06:26:26 PM »
https://sendvid.com/zv2vdcvp tell me what you think guys :)

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5424
    • View Profile
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2025, 07:28:57 PM »

WARNING!!!!
The above content is video of male masturbation.

This isn't circle jerk. This isn't fake, or faked pictures. We here ARE honest and wish not to be mislead.

Safebare, where did this guy come from?
Does anyone know what time zone our posts are set to, where it gives the date and time after the author? I'd like to know what time zone this person originated.

I woke up this morning with Trumps antics and his 600 brownshirt violent thugs released irresponsibly amongst 1500 dupes in my head and came here for some distraction. Here, I got this overt sexual attack on what we are trying to be liberated from. Intentional destructive disruption, or some guy with an inadequate penis? What was the motivation. Where did this come from and why? 

Jbee
« Last Edit: January 23, 2025, 07:47:27 PM by jbeegoode »
Barefoot all over, all over.

Greenbare Woods

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
  • Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
    • View Profile
    • Greenbare Photos
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2025, 10:32:34 PM »
I woke up this morning with Trumps antics and his 600 brownshirt violent thugs released irresponsibly amongst 1500 dupes in my head and came here for some distraction. Here,
Jbee

I have no idea what this is about.  Are you sure we live in the same country where our President got a significant majority of popular votes, and is doing all the things he promised to voters?   

We do seem to have sexual content on this forum.  I don't know how much censorship we have here.  I'm able to scroll past pornography and other sexual content without suffering any ill effects.  But, sometimes sexual content can dominate a site which would be unfortunate here.   That thought reminds me of a Facebook page I used to follow.  It became taken over by one or two users who posted so many "nature" pictures of flowers, bridges, trees, mountains, rivers, etc. etc. that it pushed out all the other content.  Sure some people enjoy pictures of flowers and rivers, but many readers were there for other content.  Some people my enjoy video of male masturbation too, but many of the other readers are here for something else.

Trump directed government agencies to stop all censorship.  I'm not sure if that applies to the FCC which fined CBS a lot of money for showing Janet Jackson's nipple on a broadcast of Super Bowl halftime.  I don't think it applies to Internet sites hosted by private companies, like this one.  So this site could choose to allow sexual content or not.   There is a good chance that Trump will declare Internet platforms like Facebook, X, etc., as "platforms" rather than "publishers."   In the US a "Publisher" is liable for content and can be sued for slander.  A "Platform" is like the phone company.  A platform provides the technology but not content.  A platform is therefore not responsible for whatever people say.  The New York Times and ABC TV are publishers. The phone company is not, and neither are companies that provide Internet hubs and hardware, like Verizon or Starlink. 

Internet Service Providers like Facebook and others have been trying to be both.  They claim immunity from lawsuits for slander or libel (platform), but still control and censor content (publisher).   Politicians in US and UK, in EU, and elsewhere want to censor content by removing political opposition they call "misinformation."  On Facebook it's commonly said that whatever their "Fact Checkers" blocked is most likely true.  Facebook suspends users and accounts who dare to post images of nudists or humans without any sexual content.

If Trump (or Congress) declares Internet Social Media to be platforms then pictures of nudists will be allowed, along with whatever porn, lies, or nonsense anyone else wants to say.   It's anyone's guess how far Trump's prohibition of censorship by government agencies will go. Will the FCC still fine licensed broadcasters who don't censor images of people?  We will see. 
Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
To see more of Bob you can view his personal photo page
http://www.photos.bradkemp.com/greenbare.html

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5424
    • View Profile
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2025, 09:19:06 PM »
I woke up this morning with Trumps antics and his 600 brownshirt violent thugs released irresponsibly amongst 1500 dupes in my head and came here for some distraction. Here,
Jbee

I have no idea what this is about.  Are you sure we live in the same country where our President got a significant majority of popular votes, and is doing all the things he promised to voters?   

We do seem to have sexual content on this forum.  I don't know how much censorship we have here.  I'm able to scroll past pornography and other sexual content without suffering any ill effects.  But, sometimes sexual content can dominate a site which would be unfortunate here.   That thought reminds me of a Facebook page I used to follow.  It became taken over by one or two users who posted so many "nature" pictures of flowers, bridges, trees, mountains, rivers, etc. etc. that it pushed out all the other content.  Sure some people enjoy pictures of flowers and rivers, but many readers were there for other content.  Some people my enjoy video of male masturbation too, but many of the other readers are here for something else.
Bob, friend, we do live in two different Americas. There are roughly half that see a significantly small margin, very close to a 50/50 "voter" split, which means that there are very nearly just as many "voters that are not upset that Trump is attempting to do what he said he would, which may actually be refreshing, but what he is doing TO voters. I also think that it is important not to exclude those millions who didn't vote. So, as you can surmise, I might feel upset by some of the radical shenanigans. You'd probably be surprised by some of what I'm not upset by, but I am outraged, embarrassed and threatened by several actions and I know that it is just beginning.

Our concern here is guessing what the government will do to our free speech and spreading the messages toward body freedom. There is a lot of educated guessing going on. There is an unprecedented tight contact with media owners, a huge influence of oligarch and corporate money and their desire for profit. There is the archaic moral authoritarian influence found in his cabinet, authors of Project 2025, which are enemies of our body freedoms. There is that Trump, as a former slut man about town, probably doesn't honestly believe in body censorship, but knows that he has to pander to that base realistically, unless his position as a lame duck frees him from them.

He is in love with a distorted image of the Gilded Age and we know it's Victorian body oppression. We don't know how this all will affect body freedom and free speech. His cronies in media are at his ear and there is that influence as you mentioned, but with the other hand, he is suing other media unfavorable to him, with frivolous cases to break their banks and attempting to arrange DOJ and FBI to go after and intimidate descent. We just can't be sure.

The algorithms are definitely channeling the media that we make judgment with and vote with and make opinions into a divided world. Two different worlds, divide an conquer. Polarizing information is creating two Americas.

But, is censorship of simple nudity profitable, or unprofitable? I think that may be the greatest influence in our concerns here, the bottom line.
Jbee
Barefoot all over, all over.

Greenbare Woods

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
  • Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
    • View Profile
    • Greenbare Photos
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2025, 01:31:48 AM »
But, is censorship of simple nudity profitable, or unprofitable? I think that may be the greatest influence in our concerns here, the bottom line.
Jbee

Well, porn has been a huge part of Internet traffic and money since Internet began.    But, simple nudity doesn't have the following that porn has. 

I'm not sure that free speech is profitable ever.  But it's supposed to be American.   At least nobody is getting arrested and sent to prisons for social media posts on this side of the pond. 
« Last Edit: January 27, 2025, 12:44:04 AM by Greenbare Woods »
Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
To see more of Bob you can view his personal photo page
http://www.photos.bradkemp.com/greenbare.html

Safebare

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #9 on: January 26, 2025, 10:12:46 PM »
Sorry, I really thought that I was responding to QuaternFluvial, not this jerk.

~Safebare

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5424
    • View Profile
Re: Couple from New England
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2025, 06:48:39 AM »
Sorry? How could you or anyone know?
Jbee
Barefoot all over, all over.