Firstly Hurrah! Dave - you are here! As per another post this evening I was worried we might have lost you in the shipwreck.
But no! Redoubtable as ever you have swum to the fair shores of Freerange Island. I'm so glad you're still in the group.
Second, Is it Daring, sexy etc.?
I seem to remember offering this opinion before but since
Danggggg! there's no way to check, here is my view:
My ambition is that the naturism I experience is totally devoid of danger and excitement. I just want to be able to go about my business naked where possible. I don't particularly want to be sociable about it but that's not to say I don't enjoy sociable situations naked if they arise. I'm an SN because I like to be in nature and outside but, like us all, have to keep out of sight of opprobrious textiles. How I wish I had places where I could walk and not be alert for being discovered. So no, there are no activities that I want to do that purposely risk discovery and the danger of discovery is a negative aspect not a positive goal to seek.
As to sexy - I believe we simply choose what we think and do. Sexuality and sexual arousal are under entirely conscious control. Nudity in itself isn't sexy but it's always sensual. Those two things are not the same. Being warmed by the sun or cooled by the breeze, feeling the grass on your back and a fly on your chest as you lie in a field or eating a piece of chocolate or comfortably falling asleep after a hard day's work are all sensual events that are nothing to do with sex. For me that's part of my reason for being a naturist* - all of that stuff is better naked.
As to sexuality, as I say, it's under conscious control. When I'm on the train and a pretty girl sits opposite or when I work with an attractive person, I can appreciate their attributes but entirely supress any sexual content to my thoughts. {I just read that back and it sounded as if I spend my commuting and working life supressing sexuality- what I meant was, that it just doesn't occur in those circumstances}.
Equally, one is not sexually aroused just by one's own nudity, otherwise just think of the inconvenience of being priapic every time you did the washing up or the obvious dangers of being thus aroused when slicing cucumber! Sexuality for me anyway is entirely voluntary and nakedness makes no difference to being able to turn it on or off.
That's not to say that one can't mix the two, however. I have been entirely alone in the dappled sun in woodland lying on soft, slightly prickly dry leaves (possibly with a fly on my chest!
) and allowed the sensual and the sexual to merge with the obvious orgasmic result. Equally, I have been in the same circumstances and simply enjoyed the birdsong and the cool breeze. In the same way I can lie in bed with my wife and talk about what we did that day etc., and in the same circumstances at other times come together in bodily union ("Gosh he turns a lovely euphemistic phrase, doesn't he?"). It's just a matter of choice.
Nudity is a choice of a way of being that enhances the life force for those of us that are of that mindset. I am sure that there are three types of people that climb Munros: Those that are fully clothed and never give a thought or desire to being naked at the top, those that are fully clothed and wish they could get naked at the top but feel too inhibited to do so and Stuart & Karla who get naked at the top and enhance their being with the freedom and extra sensual dimensions that being naked brings.
I commend the assembled company to my case and discussion, Madam Chair!
John
*The other part is the curious, difficult-to-explain and beautiful freedom of both body and soul felt whilst naked.