An interesting article, Peter. One that generated, for me, more questions.
His comment about teens and texting nude photos reminded me of this article.
I read it in the local paper by this NY Times reporter:
Eric EckholmNudity is becoming a more everyday event. Is that good? Depends on the context. Concerning pedophilia, absolutely not.
If it's just kids goofing around, the courts have more important things to spend their limited resources on.
It illustrates how the laws intended to catch pedophiles are also snagging the young and foolish. After reading it I was wondering if kids would start getting arrested for playing spin the bottle or other such titillating games designed by kids of days past to push the boundaries of social regulation. If they post pictures of playing such games, they might run afoul of the law. If they only take photos and share them without the benefit of the internet, not likely. It's just more teenage hijinks.
Kids are going to push to see how far they can go.
As Justice Potter Stewart observed in his concurrance with the majority in "Jacobellis v. Ohio" in 1964, that the Constitution protected all obscenity except "hard-core pornography." Stewart wrote,
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that."If we were to get arrested for being stupid, the jails and prisons would have more people in them than out. Kids being kids should not be prosecuted. Allowing parents and, to some degree, local jurisdictions, to impress on teenagers that some actions result in drastic consequences is the best idea.
The article also makes the point that "nudist camps or colonies" have begun to be gentrified. They are now exclusive to cruises and/or "resorts" that focus on pampering. Man, it gives you the heebie jeebies. It's kind of sad that organized nudity is being appropriated by the wealthy.
As Bob frequently says, seeing a nude person isn't going to harm any one. More lenient laws on casual nudity would be more useful than draconian measures intended to lump everyone into a single group that is dealt with by the courts with a sledgehammer to silence any and all disagreement.
Duane