Author Topic: A Call for Help Naked Hiking  (Read 17306 times)

Peter S

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 584
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #30 on: August 02, 2016, 07:21:43 PM »
As a general rule that crosses most borders, there are laws that forbid things; if there isn't a law to forbid something then that thing isn't forbidden. This is when things like prejudices, loudly expressed preferences and dogmatic ignorance step forward to fill the void.
____________________________________
Motorcycling, history, country hiking,
naked living

Davie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #31 on: August 02, 2016, 08:02:22 PM »
I think that's a main difference between Continental and British Law. In Britain you can do what you want unless a law prohibits it. Continental law says you can do nothing unless a law allows it. I prefer the former which also says you are innocent until proved guilty rather that being guilty until proved otherwise. Despite our flaws in the justice system we are lucky to have what we have and must be vigilant to see it watered down.

Davie  8)

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5353
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #32 on: August 02, 2016, 08:07:16 PM »
The system is created like the organization of government in the Constitution. There might be no law about me taking my child to a socially naturist place, but I came very close to loosing my custody of my son, simply because of the latitude of the judge who hears my case. I fortunately got a reasonable judge, not a conservative judge who thinks that he can make up law and consequence as he goes along. Odds given were give or take 50% that I would have what I perceptive as lawful justice.That could have happened. That is law. As it was, my and my friends behavior had to be curbed, enforcing the risk of falling victim of a broad interpretation of the law.

If the worse outcome had happened, the damage would have been done. At great expense, which most people don't have, I could have appealed, the damage and injustice would have occurred until I got a reasonable judge. That IS law in America. Not to mention politicians in robes and their influence on the actual reality of the law.

The family who was hit by child protective services for dropping off nude pics of their children taking a bath was law.

The broad joke of Arizona statutes can be turned against anyone, more than they are meant to. An overzealous cop can arrest and charge anyone, making simple mind your own business nudity a crime, especially when children are involved. That goes on the internet and doesn't go away, the expense is amazing, call it a fine, even though you are proven innocent. Jobs CAN be lost and careers destroyed, an extreme punishment by the actions of LAW enforcement upon the innocent.

In any case involving children, the first thing done is a ransacking of the house and especially the computer. If you have been looking at a site that involves children and nudity, this is evidence that will be used to nail your ass, no First Amendment rights, not that you have been actually involved. Last year, or a couple of years ago, the accused visited a site that had some child exploitation stories, these among some other soft porn without children. They are still going to prosecute you with this false evidence. The LAW can mess you up, even though you have done nothing. Even a government school teacher can be accused completely falsely by a mischievous child and be destroyed, guilty before being proven innocent, by the LAW. I lived in fear as a teacher middle school students that that could happen. I was even threatened by a kid with it once! They know that there is LAW.

There ARE such laws John, built into the government system, not statute. There are also laws with consequence in their effect.

If you go to Naturist Action Committee, there is a best source of legal statue LAW there, listing every state, but this is only at one level, and it is often very grim: http://naturistaction.org/   and look at the left hand column.

Look at Nevada for example, how damn broad can that one be interpreted and enforced? Imagine what it would be like in the the political court system to shake it off once it was rolling and most likely think the worst before before it gets shaken off and proven innocent. Imagine being black, brown or poor and getting clobbered with this. Even you would be handcuffed with steel digging into your wrists with the greatest pain, if not manhandled to equal beaten, thrown into the back of a cramped backseat of a police car unable to move, your feet stuffed under the front seat, your knees jammed against it unable to get comfortable, back pain, while you have to sit on your own bruising wrists, feeling every bump in the road, every corner and treated like the most lowly of life, not deserving of respect or dignity, but instead contempt. AND this punishment is for the innocent until proven guilty. That's just the way a significant percentage of police get their kicks, everywhere in this country. That is the way LAW works.

THERE ARE LAWS in the system. I believe it irresponsible to sugar coat it. We are in a potentially dangerous game, when it come to children seeing us naked, even talking about it provides suspicion to the ignorant law enforcement entities. It is not just wrong, it is sick, demented, and destructive to our children abhorrent to me, but there is the reality. I dearly wish that Jon P. was correct and this country was a reasonable tolerant place, that LAW was constitutional and people were still innocent until proven guilty, just like the Constitution used to provide for.

Has anyone actually ever talked friendly  to a cop here, or been a cop. Cops dream of catching BAD guys, fighting evil, that's why they do what they do. Some of them take it way too far. Some of them want a promotion and need a bust. Some want to feel good and effective about what they are doing, but are driven too far. Justifications happen, and poison peer influences happen to the best of us. There are many reasons. The good intentions get thrown out of kilter after getting rubbed by the system of law and this has gotten more and more frequent in my lifetime.

By the way Eyesup, good points.
Jbee
 


 
« Last Edit: August 02, 2016, 08:23:07 PM by jbeegoode »
Barefoot all over, all over.

Davie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #33 on: August 02, 2016, 08:58:19 PM »
Police Officers get caught up in the peer culture. Some think it outrageous that Magistrates have acquitted when the real truth is their case was not sound. I used to tell them that they are actually fortunate to live in a country were the judiciary is independent from the Police. Most Police Officers are fair and try to do their best, but their image is spoiled by the few and by over prescriptive laws. Some Officers will use draconian laws to deal with a simple situation instead of using the greatest tools in the tool-box - their mind to think things out and their voice to talk their way to what they need.

Most Police Officers don't want to fit anyone up, they want to do a fair job. The Police as a whole are not our enemies but a few in their ranks are and we need the Police to be accountable and remember they Police by consent. My worry is all the aggressive stuff they carry from tasars to body armour remove them further and further from the public they serve. It becomes a Police Force rather than a Police Service. To date we have an unarmed Service and I hope even with the threats we face that that remains so. Its encouraging that most Officers don't want to carry.

I actually know a few,(now retired) naturist Officers.

Davie  8)

John P

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 851
    • View Profile
    • My naturist page
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #34 on: August 03, 2016, 01:56:50 AM »
There are laws in my community that are specific to the presence of minors that view the type of nudity that the law forbids. This law was written with latitude given to the courts to “protect children” and at the same time catch anyone attempting to abuse children or engage in trafficking of child porn.

Viewing casual nudity is a different matter. Here I have no clue what the law says about that.

These are the only laws I know of. That doesn't mean those laws don't exist. I know authorities run sting operations all the time trying to find the pornographers. If laws didn't exist regarding this, the prosecutions would get tossed. They do get convictions. Ergo, the laws must exist.
Duane

"There are laws in my community that are specific to the presence of minors that view the type of nudity that the law forbids" is a lovely sentence that says "The law forbids what's forbidden by the law". And since you haven't seen fit to fill in your profile, there's no way to tell where this is all going on. I'd love to know more.

And sure, the laws exist, just as you say, to cover pornography. Let's make sure we aren't involved with pornography! Fortunately, the courts have held that nudity isn't pornographic, so we're OK.

JBG, you've been involved in a divorce, and there it's notorious that people fight with any weapon they think might work. If you could show that nudism is consistently something that costs people custody of children (I assume that was the issue for you) then you'd have an argument, but otherwise there's not much to say. Your ex tried to use nudity against you, and failed. Isn't that a sign that things aren't too bad?

Regarding anything to do with Child Protective Services, they're looking for evidence of abuse rather than enforcing any specific laws. There have been some sad cases, but I'm not aware of anyone who was prosecuted or who permanently lost their children because of anything involving nudity. If you know anything to the contrary, let's hear it.

I know the NAC website quite well, and as I say, I don't believe the laws there can hurt us. (And I also give Bob Morton, the head of the NAC, a hug every time I meet him. A big hug, because he's a big guy.)

It is definitely true that defending oneself in court is distressing and incredibly expensive. You say it's "irresponsible to sugar coat it" but I'd also call it irresponsible to exaggerate the risks, because that causes us to give up our rights before they're challenged ("When our actions do not, our fears do make us traitors" as the Bard said). If we're going to discuss risks, we have to be clear about what's happened in the past that might make us afraid in the future.

I've said "Let's hear more about it" more than once because people are justifying fear with vague speculations. Can we have facts rather than imagination?

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5353
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #35 on: August 03, 2016, 02:59:45 AM »
There are laws in my community that are specific to the presence of minors that view the type of nudity that the law forbids. This law was written with latitude given to the courts to “protect children” and at the same time catch anyone attempting to abuse children or engage in trafficking of child porn.

Viewing casual nudity is a different matter. Here I have no clue what the law says about that.

These are the only laws I know of. That doesn't mean those laws don't exist. I know authorities run sting operations all the time trying to find the pornographers. If laws didn't exist regarding this, the prosecutions would get tossed. They do get convictions. Ergo, the laws must exist.
Duane

"There are laws in my community that are specific to the presence of minors that view the type of nudity that the law forbids" is a lovely sentence that says "The law forbids what's forbidden by the law". And since you haven't seen fit to fill in your profile, there's no way to tell where this is all going on. I'd love to know more.

And sure, the laws exist, just as you say, to cover pornography. Let's make sure we aren't involved with pornography! Fortunately, the courts have held that nudity isn't pornographic, so we're OK.

JBG, you've been involved in a divorce, and there it's notorious that people fight with any weapon they think might work. If you could show that nudism is consistently something that costs people custody of children (I assume that was the issue for you) then you'd have an argument, but otherwise there's not much to say. Your ex tried to use nudity against you, and failed. Isn't that a sign that things aren't too bad?

Regarding anything to do with Child Protective Services, they're looking for evidence of abuse rather than enforcing any specific laws. There have been some sad cases, but I'm not aware of anyone who was prosecuted or who permanently lost their children because of anything involving nudity. If you know anything to the contrary, let's hear it.

I know the NAC website quite well, and as I say, I don't believe the laws there can hurt us. (And I also give Bob Morton, the head of the NAC, a hug every time I meet him. A big hug, because he's a big guy.)

It is definitely true that defending oneself in court is distressing and incredibly expensive. You say it's "irresponsible to sugar coat it" but I'd also call it irresponsible to exaggerate the risks, because that causes us to give up our rights before they're challenged ("When our actions do not, our fears do make us traitors" as the Bard said). If we're going to discuss risks, we have to be clear about what's happened in the past that might make us afraid in the future.

I've said "Let's hear more about it" more than once because people are justifying fear with vague speculations. Can we have facts rather than imagination?
Police Officers get caught up in the peer culture. Some think it outrageous that Magistrates have acquitted when the real truth is their case was not sound. I used to tell them that they are actually fortunate to live in a country were the judiciary is independent from the Police. Most Police Officers are fair and try to do their best, but their image is spoiled by the few and by over prescriptive laws. Some Officers will use draconian laws to deal with a simple situation instead of using the greatest tools in the tool-box - their mind to think things out and their voice to talk their way to what they need.

Most Police Officers don't want to fit anyone up, they want to do a fair job. The Police as a whole are not our enemies but a few in their ranks are and we need the Police to be accountable and remember they Police by consent. My worry is all the aggressive stuff they carry from tasars to body armour remove them further and further from the public they serve. It becomes a Police Force rather than a Police Service. To date we have an unarmed Service and I hope even with the threats we face that that remains so. Its encouraging that most Officers don't want to carry.

I actually know a few,(now retired) naturist Officers.

Davie  8)
An unarmed service! Still? Wow! Most don't want to carry? Amazing!

If only we here still had a civil system like that.

Since the Drug War was declared, the drug culture left the getto and couldn't be ignored and supply/demand changed, there has been a reciprocal escalation. It started with Ronald Raygun's No Knock policy in California in 1970. Before the police would knock on the door with a warrant, while the dealer hurriedly tried to flush an ounce of something down the toilet.

Then, the police all over started to get macho, and people shot back. Now the standard is a military procedure in which the victim is shocked with exploding grenades, the home purposely destroyed. Family, babies, children, old folks banged around and cussed out, all before guilt is proven. This has spilled onto the streets where police are trained to be scared at a traffic stop and intimate the driver. Then, the 911 crap has given police military power and equipment to subdue entire populations. Gang violence has erupted in response, like never before. They are putting war vets with issues in military style black police uniforms and it is mostly way out of hand. Change the drug laws and there is no excuse for this breach of civil liberty. Sure these police abuses of power happened back in the days before 1970, but it wasn't standard procedure. Next door in Oro Valley population about 30,000 retired mostly white upper middle class and golf courses, they have a swat team! There is next to no serious crime there. Here try some of this elephant repellent. Why, there are no elephants here? See, it works really well.

I got stopped several times and harassed just to intimidate me, because of my political activities, years ago. They passed a law just to stop me from exercising my freedom of speech in a way which was effective enough to topple their cart. My next door neighbor, an Hispanic guy who drove an older Chevy truck was stopped for BS reasons 42 times in just a few years there. This guy was soo white and right, other than his skin.  It is not good to carnude there unless you look correctly yuppie and white. They have had speed traps (two mph over the limit for revenue sources). They have police headquartering on the high school property. They arrest kids, perform investigations in a nearly all white schools. Lighting a small firecracker in the toilet is a major criminal offense! That's how the LAW works, more and more. A fascist militarized police force designed to subdue, intimidate, and then, hide abuses, protecting each other, under the guise of public servant and hero. Protect And serve is no longer an apt moto here. The good cops are fewer and fewer. Now, imagine what it would be like in a non-white neighborhood, or a high crime area, which brings us back to the drug laws.

To conclude my rant. I was once arrested in France for something I knew nothing about. I was about 12 or 13. The gendarme was harsh as if I was guilty. Guilty until proven innocent. The military policeman had to pull him out of my face. Innocent until proven guilty. That was my reason and great pride and gratitude returning to the USA. The constitution, The Warren court, protections and civility. In my lifetime that has disappeared in a systematic fashion. YEa, I remember the Pima County sheriffs stopping myself and my friends for suspicion, in our own neighborhoods, because we drove Volkswagens and had long hair, but all that did was radicalize us. It was just the ignorant podunk country cops to us. The top cop sheriff was handling whore houses, so it was just backwards old cowtown Arizona, we thought. It was nothing like it is now and that was the late 60's when we were as divided as a nation as we had ever been with Vietnam, the draft and that big value check called a generation. It was the time of the movie "East Rider." That was nothing like LAW enforcement today.

So, let's have a look at nudity and the LAW, shall we? How would a nude man walking across country do here? How far would he get? He might get across skinny Vermont. He might get across Kansas, there are no nudity laws there, until he was alone out in Podunk and picked up and jailed, or worse, before he actually came in contact with any children.
Jbee
Barefoot all over, all over.

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5353
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #36 on: August 03, 2016, 03:49:15 AM »
There are laws in my community that are specific to the presence of minors that view the type of nudity that the law forbids. This law was written with latitude given to the courts to “protect children” and at the same time catch anyone attempting to abuse children or engage in trafficking of child porn.

Viewing casual nudity is a different matter. Here I have no clue what the law says about that.

These are the only laws I know of. That doesn't mean those laws don't exist. I know authorities run sting operations all the time trying to find the pornographers. If laws didn't exist regarding this, the prosecutions would get tossed. They do get convictions. Ergo, the laws must exist.
Duane

JBG, you've been involved in a divorce, and there it's notorious that people fight with any weapon they think might work. If you could show that nudism is consistently something that costs people custody of children (I assume that was the issue for you) then you'd have an argument, but otherwise there's not much to say. Your ex tried to use nudity against you, and failed. Isn't that a sign that things aren't too bad?

Regarding anything to do with Child Protective Services, they're looking for evidence of abuse rather than enforcing any specific laws. There have been some sad cases, but I'm not aware of anyone who was prosecuted or who permanently lost their children because of anything involving nudity. If you know anything to the contrary, let's hear it.

I know the NAC website quite well, and as I say, I don't believe the laws there can hurt us. (And I also give Bob Morton, the head of the NAC, a hug every time I meet him. A big hug, because he's a big guy.)

It is definitely true that defending oneself in court is distressing and incredibly expensive. You say it's "irresponsible to sugar coat it" but I'd also call it irresponsible to exaggerate the risks, because that causes us to give up our rights before they're challenged ("When our actions do not, our fears do make us traitors" as the Bard said). If we're going to discuss risks, we have to be clear about what's happened in the past that might make us afraid in the future.

I've said "Let's hear more about it" more than once because people are justifying fear with vague speculations. Can we have facts rather than imagination?
John P., You need to go back and read what I wrote. There are examples, both personal and in the media, there are several attorneys involved, explaining how it is in court. That IS how it works.
 
CPS is looking, but they don't stop there. They enforce unencumbered by any actual law, making it up unrestricted. There are numerous examples. If you have a BA in anything, like even philosophy, you can get a job with them and act as if you are an expert. I don't know where you live, but you obviously haven't experienced LAW as it actually functions in America, often, but not always extremely unjust. This is real not imagined. Much of it my personal experiences. That's the facts, not speculation, my experience and several attorney friends and some that I have engaged with. The outcome is determined by the judges, whose opinions vary in extremes. They are not all brilliant, nor are they all just...didn't I already say that. Please, go back and read what I wrote.

Next time that you hug Bob Morten (you must have some long lanky arms to get all around that furry torso ;)), sit with him and listen to his grim stories. Call him for help, if you ever need it and get the hard truth. I have. Ask him why there is NAC. It IS a very serious matter, especially after law enforcement gets a hold of it and loses track of the actual intent of the law. I've heard many many examples come from his lips over the years. Tell him how you imagine that the LAW works.

 I have no doubt that the law is specific as you say, where you are, but I doubt that most cops on the street have heard of, or have any clear understanding of those LAWs and delineations. It is likely more dangerous than you are aware. On the other hand, cops sometimes listen when you explain the LAW to them and sometimes they just aren't sure of the law and opt out of enforcement, and the hassle of thinking, pleading ignorance. Then sometimes you'll get pulled out of your car and arrested because dumbo thinks that you are a smartass. Ya never know what flavor ya get, but ya need to know that there are a variety of flavors.

I'm just being realistic here. I hope that I don't come across unfriendly to you. I just might need to say, that's not the intent of my discourse.
Jbee

Barefoot all over, all over.

JOhnGw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
  • Almost anything worth doing is better done naked.
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #37 on: August 03, 2016, 10:33:04 AM »
<snip good stuff>
However I suppose there is no big money making corporation making profit on the benefits of children having nudity around them while growing up.  Therefore who has the extra millions to blow on a good cause with zero profit potential?
As far as I can see the only corporate money made out of nudity is clothing manufacture to hide the body and in particular the immense mark-up on minimal bits of Lycra.
While this is true I can't see any change coming about.
JOhn

Do not do unto others as you would that they should do unto you. Their tastes may not be the same.
George Bernard Shaw, Maxims for Revolutionaries

John P

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 851
    • View Profile
    • My naturist page
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #38 on: August 03, 2016, 02:58:08 PM »
I'm sorry to have allowed myself to be drawn down an irrelevant path. My point in this thread is that there are no laws against participation by juveniles in naturist discussion groups on the Internet, either reading or writing. I think it's very wrong to imply that naturism is "adults only", and I won't be part of any group which does that.


eyesup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #39 on: August 09, 2016, 07:03:22 PM »
. . . is a lovely sentence that says "The law forbids what's forbidden by the law".
Sorry to have been too succinct. :-[ I was making a fast paced statement that if you are doing anything nude that is against the law and a child witnesses it, you will also be held accountable for the DAMAGE to the child. "The law forbids what's forbidden by the law", would encompass the entire law code. A little too broad. :)

Quote from:
And since you haven't seen fit to fill in your profile, there's no way to tell where this is all going on. I'd love to know more.
I wasn’t aware of that! Fixed!
Does a lack of coordinates imply a lack of veracity?

Quote from:
Can we have facts rather than imagination?
“Logic will get you from A to Z; imagination will get you everywhere.”
― Albert Einstein

eyesup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #40 on: August 09, 2016, 07:09:21 PM »
Quote from: JOhn
As far as I can see the only corporate money made out of nudity is clothing manufacture to hide the body and in particular the immense mark-up on minimal bits of Lycra.

I agree with the overall [::)] meaning of that, but it's like blaming the cook for the weight problems of the customer. If the customer wasn't spending money on it, there wouldn't be a market for it. If you buy into the advertising campaign, that's not the fault of the company. That's the fault of the buyer.

Duane

eyesup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #41 on: August 09, 2016, 07:11:59 PM »
Quote from: JohnP
I'm sorry to have allowed myself to be drawn down an irrelevant path.

All streams eventually make it to the sea. There is no such thing as an irrelevant path.

There are wandering paths! Through unknown territories! :D

Duane

jbeegoode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5353
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #42 on: September 09, 2016, 05:53:21 AM »
The site is dead. "This site has stepped back for a bit."

Anyone want to take it over?
Jbee
Barefoot all over, all over.

eyesup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
    • View Profile
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #43 on: September 09, 2016, 06:06:31 AM »
I was reading through posts he sent out that I received on my Yahoo acct and he has had a couple of strokes.  He may have missed some payments.

Duane


Greenbare Woods

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1952
  • Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
    • View Profile
    • Greenbare Photos
Re: A Call for Help Naked Hiking
« Reply #44 on: September 09, 2016, 01:53:30 PM »
I might be willing to take it over. I don't know the fellow who ran it. 

Can we contact him? 
Human bodies are natural, comfortable, and green.
To see more of Bob you can view his personal photo page
http://www.photos.bradkemp.com/greenbare.html