I'm really pleased that Karla is keeping an eye on us and I agree with the drift of what Nudewalker had to say. I think we should just hang loose. 139 members and about 50 of us posting at all. We are a nice and erudite group with a specific interest (and wide ranging digressions!). I'd rather be few and well connected than many and lose the clear identity of the forum content. As I and others have observed before on several occasions, here and on TSNS, aside from this group and forum, it's very hard to find another naturist site with such a high level of conversation and freedom from the lowest level of inane drivel in its content.
It's quality rather than quantity for me any day.
However, that said, I am not being hypocritical as I have posted before lamenting the glory days of TSNS and the larger quantity of quality we used to generate relative to today. So I would say we could do with a few more total members, say 200-250, the 30 or so of us that do talk together could rise to say 50 and perhaps if some of our esteemed friends might post a bit more rather than tending to invisible observation - I am prepared to name names
such as Dave balead, nib, yorksmark, Paul Midnightrider, Tony nudeytony, Norman yeldew and a slew of others longer gone...tanman, hymie, alf, for instance, then the conversation might be even richer and more diverse.
Looking at the main FRN site, one STAT that I find disappointing is that Stuart & Karla haven't posted a Munro or a skinny dip, a Heathland walk or a foreign adventure for several years (3 or 4). Not only are these two distinguished as being our kind hosts here in the forum but I can't think of many people who are (were?) such wonderful, inspirational exemplars of secret naturism and naturism in nature as they are. That's why it was good to hear from Karla earlier.
John